What's new

Apexi PFC vs Greddy E-Manage

P

Project S15

Guest
Hi fellas, I am thinking about replacing or giving a piggyback to my ECU.
I am considering two of above options but I cant decide.
I am sort of going for E-Manage because I like the idea of using the standard ECU and also its more affordable and it can support up to quite a high horse power.
Is E-Manage Harder or easier to mod compared with PFC?

any good or bad opinions abt these two would be appriciated.
 
S

S15R

Guest
i will pick e-manage :D

trust d1 s15 is using e-manage and using stock ecu(clever) :d and its as good as power fc

well any kind of ecu or sub ecu are much the same, but you need to get something that in christchurch someone can tune it for you :D
 

Yakozan

Sweedish Chef
🔥 Contributing Member 🔥
Joined
14 November 2005
Messages
3,447
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
40
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
Website
www.s15oc.com
Country
I'm also considering these different solutions.
A would like the Apexi but the e-manage is so much cheaper.

I'm just after fixing my fuel and ignition timing to up the boost a bit.
So I don't think the Apexi is worth the extra dough. Or am I wrong??
 

Nicely

Moving on...
Founder of S15OC
Joined
26 October 2005
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Location
Helsinki, Finland
Website
www.jull.net
Country
Although I have an Emanage, I'd say if you could afford it, go for the PFC. The PFC allows much greater control of the engine management.

Due to the nature of the Emanage, it is a compromise. The original ECU settings are unchanged. The Emanage intercepts the signals sent out and changes them before they get to the engine.

The PFC alters its settings directly in its ECU. This allow far greater fine tuning.

Saying that, I'm more than happy with my Emanage. :)
 
S

S15R

Guest
depends where you live :D

like is chch nz not many can tune HKS F-CON V Pro
e-manage or power fc is probably better for you tommy
 
M

Meddy

Guest
Go for the PFC as has been said the Emanage is just a compromise. Cheaper yes but for good reason. The PFC is also a lot easier to initialise and set up than the FCon unit. As has been said though it very much depends on what your local tuners are familiar with using.
 

Nicely

Moving on...
Founder of S15OC
Joined
26 October 2005
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Location
Helsinki, Finland
Website
www.jull.net
Country
A large number of places can map the Emanage and PFC (including yourself). The F-Cons requires specialised equipment.
 
Joined
8 May 2006
Messages
874
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Dublin , Ireland
Country
Just a question

wanted to know whats the difference between the range of PFC
theres like a standard one,
D-jetro version and a pro thing the pro is dis continued....

As i wnt to get one too.
 
Joined
5 January 2006
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
NZ
I run a power FC and find it good. Also, with the hand commander you can do away with a raft of gauges.

D-Jetro means no need for an AFM - correct. I understand the cost diff between this and buying the reg version + Z32 AFM is pretty similar. I would go D-jetro if I were to run a monster turbo set up.
 
Top